December 2008 >
S M T W T F S
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
Myth and Meaning for the Learning Facilitator PDF Print E-mail

Myth and Meaning for the Learning Facilitator

Daniel DiGriz

Man first made stories when he looked out from the dark of the cave and saw eyes; he made stories to drive away the snuffling in the dark. Likewise, when he discovered fire, he told tales around the blaze to separate the light from his fears. Story is the legacy of all cultures and the language of all peoples.


Some stories are timeless. They express the universal so clearly that successive peoples adapt, modify, and transmit them down through the ages to become the birthright of new civilizations. One may even suggest that a society is born when it first constructs its myth ? first and foremost, its myth of self. Myth is unique in that each generation tailors it to accommodate its own values and reason for being. In this way, the stream of its telling swells and is enriched.


For this reason, stories have always held a special place among teachers. The power of stories to communicate values, ideas, and cultural imperatives has made them a perennial instructional tool. Teachers are even credited with inventing new modes of myth-making; one thinks easily of Socrates and of Jesus Christ. Whether fairy tale, fable, or parable, teachers have always made use of the unique ability of stories to show rather than simply tell. Teachers draw on stories for a mode of communication the subtleties of which are not easily reduced to a lesson plan.  

When one watches a Korean pansori opera, or listens to a Hopi storyteller, the consciousness of learning and the relation between speaker and listener is transformed. The cadence of voice and plot are more like the beat of a drum than the pedantry of classroom lecture. When Jesus began, "there was a certain man who lived in a certain city?" we knew that what followed must answer for raising the ancient rhythm. It must pay off in a lasting way.

Various authors from John Ruskin to Georges Polti (The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations) have alleged that there are only a certain number of plots*, and that all stories simply pursue those in different ways. Whether or not that is so, this research suggests that we have been telling each other very similar stories all along.

A teacher wants to demonstrate differences in personality types. She begins:

A child is sent home with a note pinned to his shirt. "It seems as though Peter would rather have fun with his friends than concentrate on his studies?" Is he failing school, or is the school failing him?

The question is: why do we feel as if we've known Peter, even though he's a fictional character? We have known him. Nearly all of us have encountered Peter, by one name or another. Stories are like that, and yet we never cease telling and pursuing them in theatres, books, or at the local pub. How many modern stories begin with "one man stands alone?" or "some mysteries were never meant to be solved?" ? these are conjuring up the heroism and fear that lies in the basic human struggle to exist.

It is this power, in the hands of learning facilitators, that makes stories an irresistible tool to create learning. It isn't necessary that the story be original. In fact, there is immense power in unoriginality. What breathes unique life into the experience of storytelling for learning is, in fact, repetition of the familiar.

Comedian Jerry Seinfeld has made an entire career out of simply observing what we see every day. Speaking to the common experience, he looks closely at what we, in seeing, often miss. The beauty of using stories for learning is that such a rich tradition of tales already exists in the patterns of our own lives. That's the open secret of making myth. When stories are honestly personal, they succeed in being universal. Myth is the reflection of our common experience, the evocation of our fundamental relation to each other. It is in the telling that our familiar tales become new.

In the autumn season of the wine, word went forth . . .

I met her outside a coffee shop, looking at a fountain . . .

One day you are walking down the street . . .

That the house was haunted, he ruled out immediately . . .

Looking at these lines, each of which is a beginning, is there not a sense that we could finish the story, arriving in a somewhat different place than the author, but a place just as meaningful?

Arguably, the art of storytelling is most appropriate when we know what it is we are really doing. Rather than reducing it to merely classroom technique or only pedagogical method, shall we not step up as cantors of the human epic? Perhaps there is good cause in conscientiously beating the drum.


* See "The Basic Plots in Literature" [http://www.ipl.org/div/farq/plotFARQ.html] for examples.

Copyright 2005, Daniel DiGriz. All Rights Reserved.

 

Upcoming Events

Mon, Dec 8th, @8:00am - 05:00PM
Employee Learning Week 2008
Tue, Dec 9th, @11:30am - 01:00PM
COC-ASTD December Meeting

Your Opinion, Please...

I would like to use this website
 

Search all



joomla templates by dezinedepot
© 2008 ASTD - Central Oklahoma Chapter
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
RSS 0.91
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
ATOM 0.3
OPML